BlogAds

Show Me Progress blog advertising is good for you

Blogads

In KC? Join us for libations every Wednesday!
Drinking Liberally - Midtown KC

Vulcan's Forge:

The Midwest's Premiere Sterling Silver Jewelers
Vulcans Forge

Located in the heart of Westport -- The Original Kansas City

Californos Californo's: Elegant dining in a delightful atmosphere, located in the heart of Westport
Search




Advanced Search
Local / Regional Links
National Links

Missouri news, views, and issues - Show Me Progress

Heckuva job, Tea Party!

  

by: hotflash

Sun Aug 07, 2011 at 19:31:52 PM CDT


MoveOn's take on the S & P downgrade

MoveOn is spreading the chart above all over the internet.

Ed Martin quotes the S & P report,

The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. We could lower the long-term rating to 'AA' within the next two years if we see that less reduction in spending than agreed to, higher interest rates, or new fiscal pressures during the period result in a higher general government debt trajectory than we currently assume in our base case.

moralizes on it,

While I expect our opponents in President Obama's party to derive all the wrong lessons from this embarrassment, the brutal reality is that the much ballyhooed "victory" of the debt deal did not convince this bond ratings agency that we had begun to master our spending problem.

and conveniently overlooks where S & P laid the blame. The report says in three different places that Congress's unwillingness to raise revenue will make it impossible for the country to regain its AAA credit rating. For example:

Compared with previous projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress reinforced by passing the act.

[last paragraph, page 4]

In plainer English, the Bush tax cuts are pulling us under and the Republicans refuse to do anything about it. According to the CBO, 60% of our debt is caused by those tax cuts. The public wants the gazillionaires to start paying their share. But the Tea Partiers, says Howard Dean, have been smoking tea instead of drinking it. Whatever. Being whacked out of their heads is no excuse. They conducted negotiations while one of the negotiating parties was hanging out of a window by his ankles, and now they want to blame Obama for dropping the change out of his pockets.

Repeat after me, until the nation gets it: Our AA+ rating is the fault of those extortionists in the Tea Party. We could solve the problem by letting those tax cuts expire, by not giving oil companies $53 billion a year, and by laying off of working people, who are already paying more than their fair share.

hotflash :: Heckuva job, Tea Party!
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email





Heckuva a job Tea Party? (0.00 / 0)
Oh, let's not forget that our side controlls the senate and the executive branch.  When are Democrats going to realize that there is no reward for knuckling under to the right-wing radicals?  When are we finally going to stand up to them and start fighting back?    

Every other time but this one, (0.00 / 0)
I'd be saying "here, here!" But defaulting? No, that cannot be allowed. The problem is that, as you say, caving is the Democratic default position. Knowing that, why would Republicans be anything BUT intransigent? Ezra Klein quotes Ross Douthat:

This is the reality that liberals need to face: Much of the Republican "intransigence" and "hostage-taking" and "terrorism" that they deplore is a direct consequence of the fact that Republicans assume that Democrats will always, always, cave on taxes. And so long as that assumption keeps getting vindicated by events, there's no incentive for the G.O.P. to accede to sweeping compromises on deficit reduction. Why would you compromise with a party that won't actually fight for the revenues required to pay for the programs it claims to want to protect? Why would you sign off on tax increases that your notionally pro-government opposition doesn't want to sign off on themselves?

Then Klein adds a corollary:

The interesting implication of this, which you see clearly in Ross's post, is that moderate Republicans are being undermined by weak-kneed Democrats. After all, if centrist Republicans can't credibly argue a hard-line position will lead to much higher taxes, they can't credibly argue that the Republicans Party needs to compromise.

If I didn't have a conscience, I'd go join the Republicans. The 'please don't hurt me' mentality on our side is disgusting.


[ Parent ]
No we don't (0.00 / 0)
Lee, you forget that 41 is the majority in the Senate.  That majority can, and HAS, blocked anything they don't like and that "anything" has been EVERYTHING.

[ Parent ]
It's our own damn fault (0.00 / 0)
that 41 is the majority in the Senate. Dems could have changed the filibuster rules last January, but as always, they wimped out.

[ Parent ]
About
Read before posting:

Getting Started

Posting Guidelines

Diary Formatting Tips

Congressional Contact Info

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


SMP on Facebook
Show Me Progress on Facebook

Other State Blogs
News & Announcements

Powered by: SoapBlox