BlogAds

Show Me Progress blog advertising is good for you

Blogads

In KC? Join us for libations every Wednesday!
Drinking Liberally - Midtown KC

Vulcan's Forge:

The Midwest's Premiere Sterling Silver Jewelers
Vulcans Forge

Located in the heart of Westport -- The Original Kansas City

Californos Californo's: Elegant dining in a delightful atmosphere, located in the heart of Westport
Search




Advanced Search
Local / Regional Links
National Links

Missouri news, views, and issues - Show Me Progress

More on McCaskill's "Defense" of Coal-Dependent States

  

by: Clark

Sun Jun 28, 2009 at 08:31:56 AM CDT


Brad Johnson at Think Progress has a good post regarding Claire McCaskill's tweet on the climate bill that I mentioned yesterday. While McCaskill claimed that cap and trade needed more work to defend Missouri families and businesses from extra costs imposed on coal dependent states, Brad points out that courtesy of congressmen in coal-dependent districts, like Rep. Rick Boucher (D-VA), the House bill already includes billions to make sure coal is protected for decades. I wonder what changes McCaskill would like to make to the bill in order to make ACES even more friendly to Big Coal.

Missouri currently gets a lot of of its electricity from coal-fired power plants (85%), but we get practically none of that coal from our own state. Over 90% of our coal is transported via rail from Wyoming. It's not like tons of jobs in Missouri depend on coal mining. And it's not like electricity is magically getting cheaper with coal - the PSC has approved rate hikes for Ameren in 2007 and again in 2008, for example.

According to a study from the NRDC, when you take in to account the incentives and resources provided for energy efficiency (which the CBO largely did not), in 2020 even coal dependent states like Missouri will have a lower average electric bill ($6.32 less per month per household) and lower transportation costs ($13.93 per month per household) than if we had done nothing but continue with the status quo of relying on coal.

So instead of relying on the status quo, why not invest in making sure that Missourians have the job-generating clean energy economy that we voted for in overwhelming numbers over the entire state last November?

Clark :: More on McCaskill's "Defense" of Coal-Dependent States
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email





Replacing coal (0.00 / 0)
is not a viable option.  Sounds good;  won't work.  Arguments in support of replacing coal are like the Republicans' arguments for patriotism --- there is no defense for the opposition.

Coal is dirty;  mining is dangerous - more so than military service; coal trains take forever to pass a grade crossing, etc.

Now ... find a replacement.  You can't.


Strange statement (0.00 / 0)
You mean we're doomed when coal reserves run out?


[ Parent ]
About
Read before posting:

Getting Started

Posting Guidelines

Diary Formatting Tips

Congressional Contact Info

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


SMP on Facebook
Show Me Progress on Facebook

Other State Blogs
News & Announcements

Powered by: SoapBlox