BlogAds

Show Me Progress blog advertising is good for you

Blogads

MMA
Search




Advanced Search
Local / Regional Links
National Links

Missouri news, views, and issues - Show Me Progress

Akin and Leutkemeyer have things (mostly) their way at town hall

| More

by: hotflash

Fri Apr 17, 2009 at 14:31:30 PM CDT


Last week, Senator McCaskill held one of her Kitchen Table Talks at St. Charles Community College. This week, Representatives Todd Akin and Blaine Leutkemeyer held a town hall on the same campus. The different formats told a tale. Although the senator's crowd was, understandably, larger (it filled a gym), Claire let it all hang out. She drew questions from a fish bowl and answered them rapid fire. The two Republican representatives are wound a lot tighter, so the event was choreographed. I was discouraged from, though not forbidden to tape. The moderator chose the questions, and they--can you imagine the coincidence of it?--exactly fitted the topics the two men had announced in advance that they wanted to talk about.

The invitation had been to small businessmen, so the audience of nearly 200 consisted mostly of businessmen and juco students. We were treated, before the Q & A, to an impassioned rant from a Union, MO, electrical contractor--a Fox News junkie, who believes that Citigroup and GM should be allowed to fail. I was flashing back to the Tea Party at Kiener Plaza the night before. The man has no sense of history. If the banking system and one of our largest employers (plus all of its suppliers) were to simultaneously nosedive, it would be 1931 again. And his electrical contracting business might well go under in the depression that would result.

Once the Q & A session started, the two representatives mostly peddled their disinformation unchallenged, and I don't throw the term "disinformation" around lightly.

  • Two audience members staged a brief but fiery uprising when liberty loving Akin bemoaned the loss of the secret ballot in union elections.  

    But after the gentleman was escorted from the room, the Republicans said whatever they pleased without contradiction.

    • We won the Iraq war (?!) in spite of the fact that no one knew how hard it would be to control all those "Arab factions". I knew before we went in there. Did you? We must be among the damned liberal ivory tower academics that W didn't trust.
    • Akin gave a lengthy treatise on the reason that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae caused this country's financial meltdown. As if.

    The Q & A focused on convincing small businessmen that Obama's policies will ruin them. Cap and trade, according to Akin, is "cap and tax." It will raise energy costs 40-65 percent in Missouri, he said, and cost each family $3100 extra dollars a year. And all of this wasted money to "solve a problem that sound science says may not even be a problem." He averred that it is not clear that rising CO2 levels are causing warming. That's why scientists have been forced to abandon the term "global warming" in favor of "climate change."

hotflash :: Akin and Leutkemeyer have things (mostly) their way at town hall
Instead of talking about constructive ways to deal with energy issues, Akin scared the bejeebers out of the businessmen and hapless students in the audience by saying that if we don't let coal-fired power plants  continue to be built in the U.S.,  American coal will be shipped to China where they are building 250 coal power plants this year alone.  (Never mind the fact that China has most of the world's coal.)

Oh, and he took time to empathize with beleaguered businessmen who are buried under environmental restrictions and regs. But, sigh, he thought there was little hope of any easing in that problem with Democrats in charge.

I'm embarrassed for Akin and for the Missourians who've kept him in office. He ignores energy and environmental issues by using the same sandpile where George Bush used to bury his head. If we don't wean ourselves off coal and start reducing CO2 levels, the cost of energy will be a moot point, sir. Your grandchildren won't have to pay for any of the money Democrats are spending now; the climate will kill them. Excuse me while I try to save your grandchildren's lives.

The two representatives also tackled the pressing problem of immigration. (I haven't quoted Leutkemeyer yet because he echoes Akin so much that Susan Cunningham suggests we save a congressional salary by naming one of them Akemeyer and sending him to D.C. with the authority to vote twice on everything.) The Pew Hispanic Center estimates that Missouri has 35,000 to 65,000 illegal immigrants out of the 5.75 million residents. Say the Pew Hispanic Center is wrong and the figure is twice that. So? I don't say we shouldn't insist that employers e-verify new hires, but this issue is a dead horse. Put down the whip.

As for health care problems, those can basically be solved, says Akin, if we have "portability," the right to take our health insurance with us when we change jobs. See how easy that was?

As Susan observed, "this is what passes for public discourse in the Land of Oz. Heaven help us."

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email




sometimes i wonder why you bother. but I know why and I appreciate it. (0.00 / 0)
thanks hotflash!  wow.

I don't know how this is supposed to scare anyone (0.00 / 0)
America will have to export coal to China? In terms of our economy, so what if we're exporting a product to China?

I agree that it would be terrible for CO2 emissions if China absorbed our coal exports, but we'll reap the economic benefits of having switched first and becoming an exporter of green technology.


When I first moved here and began to learn about Mr. Akin ... (3.00 / 1)
I began to feel like I had moved to the place under the bridge where all the goblins live.  Now I have come to believe that he manages to coast back into office again and again because of the power of incumbency, his seeming blandness -- which fools lots of moderate Republicans out here-- combined with the general mismanagement of the Missouri Democratic party ... but then again, this district also elected Jane Cunningham, and baby beast-in-training, Andrew Koenig, to the state legislature, so perhaps it really is that place under the bridge.

And it turns out (3.00 / 1)
that the $3100 a year on additional energy costs per family if cap and trade passes is a crock. Sean at Fired Up! lays out the crux of it:

As we've noted before, the St. Petersburg Times' PolitiFact.com called this claim (made by Roy Blunt and http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.... many other Republicans]) a bunch of "hot air," and gave the lie their "Pants on Fire" award:

To back up the claim, their staff pointed us to an M.I.T. report that says a similar a cap-and-trade proposal (the administration has not yet detailed their own version) would raise $366 billion per year...

"It's just wrong," said John Reilly, an energy, environmental and agricultural economist at M.I.T. and one of the authors of the report. "It's wrong in so many ways it's hard to begin."



Here's an even clearer explanation (0.00 / 0)
of why the Republican claims that cap and trade will cost each family $3100 a year are wrong:

Apparently from this M.I.T. study, which found that a cap-and-trade plan along the lines of the one envisioned by the Obama administration would raise $366 billion a year at the outset. In reality, many of those costs will be passed on to consumers, but those costs will be offset by rebates and conservation and efficiency measures and the transition to other fuel sources and so on. In fact, the exact same study concluded that the actual costs to consumers would begin at $31 a year--or $79 per family. So the Republicans were off by a factor of about 40. But hey, what's an order of magnitude or two between friends.

As is usual, Republicans have framed it wonderfully: "light switch tax". What should we call it? Cool planet tax? That's nowhere near as good, not as concrete.


[ Parent ]
Let's call it... (0.00 / 0)
..."make sure your grandchildren's children will be able to breathe investment."

543,895 votes

[ Parent ]
See how hard it is (0.00 / 0)
to come up with a concrete image? I think of it the way you described it, but that's unwieldy. "Light switch tax" is brilliant.

[ Parent ]
How about... (0.00 / 0)
..."Let your heirs breathe clean air"?

543,895 votes

[ Parent ]
It is really difficult to come up with a slogan that works because (3.00 / 1)
of the other guy is so good at lies -- no scruples at all in their nameing strategy.  Remember the Clear-Skies act of 2003, or NCLB?   Examples are to numerous to count.  

[ Parent ]
Card Check vs. Secret Ballot (0.00 / 0)
It's true that the bill doesn't remove secret ballots for unions - the audience members weren't wrong.  It's also a predictable consequence of passing this bill that unions will abandon the secret ballot in favor of card check - Akin wasn't wrong.  

Assume we had a law allowing managers to vote in unionization elections.  If we imagine a new law to allow unions to decide to disallow managers, of course it'd result in managers losing their vote, as it makes unionization easier.  Similarly, the card check system allows easier unionization through intimidation and possible trickery[1].  Yes, there's intimidation already.  Is the solution more intimidation?

[1] http://link.brightcove.com/ser...  (video against card check and overly emotional in presentation, but hard to argue with)


About
Read before posting:

Getting Started

Posting Guidelines

Diary Formatting Tips

Congressional Contact Info

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


SMP on Facebook
Show Me Progress on Facebook

Other State Blogs
News & Announcements

(Sitemeter stats from July 01, 2008)

Powered by: SoapBlox